What kind of sweeping robot is the most practical? 3 well-known brand comparison evaluation

What kind of sweeping robot is the most practical? 3 well-known brand comparison evaluation

Because I didn't want to clean it, someone invented the vacuum cleaner. Later, I didn't even think about it. I also developed a sweeping robot... As a lazy person, Pole Guo also used a lot of sweeping robots, but these sweeping robots, each sweeping All the corners were still hit by a flurry of fire, and they looked extremely afflicted; the dust on the ground was more than that, just as it was like a cloud, the dust sweeping everywhere...

Of course, with the development of technology, many sweeping robots have now been able to sweep the house “cleanly”, but only because it looks just like there are plenty of allergens in the cracks and carpets in the room. Such as pollen, mold, hair, etc. have not been cleared.

Recently, the media collected the most famous three sweeping robots on the market - the Dyson 360 Eye, iRobot 980, and Kovos DR95. They designed a series of challenges in terms of suction size, filterability, and climbing performance. Test its performance.

Part 1 Suction test

In the suction test section, four different levels of suction tests were tried.

Level 1: Carpet Suction Test

Faced with soda powder sprinkled on carpets, all three robots exhibited a certain amount of suction. Among them, the fastest cleaning speed and the cleanest were the Dyson 360 Eye. The iRobot 980 also sucked cleanly, but it needed to be cleaned twice. , so it takes longer, and Cobos DR95 suction obviously needs to be strengthened.

Level 2: gap test

This time, the difficulty is increased. The gap between the three is relatively large in the face of soda powder in the 0.5cm floor gap.

The strong suction of the Dyson 360 Eye comes from a 78,000 rpm digital motor. After the gaps, the soda powder is sucked cleanly; the iRobot 980 effect is secondarily followed; the Cobos DR95 still needs to work hard.

Level 3: Web Testing

What about adding a layer of mesh fabric to the floor gap? In the upgrade test, the mesh cloth was still unable to stop the suction of the Dyson 360 Eye, and the soda powder was sucked cleanly; the Covos DR95 performed better than the iRobot 980.

Level 4: Micropowder Testing

In the final suction test, the testers collected 0.3 ** of fine powder and sprinkled on the floor surface. At first glance, all three robots cleaned well, but through the microscope and UV lamps, the Dyson 360 Eye can be seen. After cleaning, there were almost no traces, iRobot 980 left regular traces of residues and there were many large residues; Covos DR95 showed a smear-like residue and needed much improvement.

Part 2 filterability test

The secondary pollution of the sweeping robot is a problem that many people will ignore. In the second part of the test, it is mainly to test the filterability of the sweeping robot to see if there is a secondary pollution problem.

Level 1: Color Test

First of all, all three robots were replaced with brand new clean filters, and then the same amount of colored powder on the ground was sucked out. From the video, the iRobot 980 and Cobos DR95's side brush were raised. A lot of color powder, Dyson 360 Eye's performance is much better, almost no color powder around is brought up.

Remove the filter after sweeping the color powder. By comparison, the color of the Dyson 360 Eye filter is the lightest, followed by the iRobot 980. The deepest staining is the Covos DR95.

The double-layer filter screen Covos owns is based on increasing the number of screens and setting a double filter on the dust to achieve the effect of secondary filtration. This is a more physical filtering method that allows Coworth to perform cleaning operations. At the time, it cannot completely absorb the dust and concentrate in the dust box. More or less, there will be missing dust floating in the air and causing secondary pollution. iRobot's high-efficiency dust filter with triple efficient cleaning system, precision filters, and high-speed cleaning rollers can not only adsorb most of the particulate matter, but also absorb most of the small particles such as allergens and dust, compared to traditional In the case of a single screen or double screen, dirt is more concentratedly absorbed.

Dyson's filter is the lightest color, mainly because of Dyson's patented cyclonic separation technology. It uses cyclones to inhale dust. Large dust is thrown into the dust box first. Small dust continues to rise due to its light weight. After reaching the top of the dust box, it entered the scope of the cyclone adsorption and was also thrown in the dust box.

The extreme test of soda ash powder also proved the previous test results. Faced with a large amount of soda ash, iRobot 980 and Covos DR95 have different degrees of dust at the air outlet.

Level 2: Gas Test

The upgraded filterability test selected cigarette cakes + sealed glass boxes. The performance of three sweeping robots was different. In the face of high smoke, the iRobot 980 injected a lot of smoke; the Covos DR95 was like a humidifier. Smoke slowly emanated; Dyson's 360 Eye performed better, with little smoke spilling.

Part 3 Passed sexual test

In the final part of the test, the ability of the three sweeping robots to climb over obstacles was compared.

Level 1: Ladder Test

The iRobot 980 and the Covos DR95 in the roller-type design are relatively easy to climb over the first level when facing a stair-like staircase, but in the face of an increased second level, the iRobot 980 is Half of the move was not allowed, and the Cobos DR95 was a direct turnaround; the Dyson 360 Eye with a tracked design successfully crossed two levels.

Level 2: Obstacle Testing

Three sweeping robots equipped with different positioning and mapping technologies, in the face of the bowling alley, the coverage of the route was good, but iRobot 980 and Coworth DR95 more or less knocked over some bowling pins; Dyson Thanks to the smaller body, it also has a panoramic camera and SLAM map technology blessings, flexible avoidance of these bowling pins.

Through this series of rigorous tests of limits, we can clearly see where the three sweeping robots are, and what sweeping robots successfully completed this series of tests. You may know how to do smart. Make a wise choice, and in that case, come and choose a sweeping robot that suits you best!

Smart TV/box information can focus on smart TV information network sofa butler (http://), China's influential TV box and smart TV website, providing information, communication, TV boxes, smart TVs, smart TV software, etc. Answering questions.

Disposable Electronic Atomizer

Disposable Electronic Atomizer,Disposable Atomizer Electronic Cigarette,Disposable Electronic Atomizer Adapter,Disposable Electronic Atomizer Pen

Lensen Electronics Co., Ltd , https://www.lensenvape.com

This entry was posted in on